Facts; as of Wednesday, April 2, 2008

1. The STOMPer, Amos from CG 22/07, apologized for implicating the school in this matter but did not apologize for making the wrong assumptions.

2. The STOMPer did not apologize directly to STOMP but to the school.

3. The college handbook did not state that all letters has to be vetted and cleared by the school before submitting them to the media.

4. The STOMPer’s intention was to highlight the issue and gather opinions of the public, not to demand an apology from the school or the discipline master or to gather students for a demonstration.

5. Hence he has already apologized for tarnishing the school’s name. (Refer to 1.)

6. He was not compelled to do so.

7. The STOMPer, a.k.a. eimerz0506, accepts no liability for the content of comments not posted by him, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided.